|
|
||||
|
||||
|
Case of the Week Because Appellate Court decisions are so critical to legal defenses in DUI/DWI arrests, Mr. Head has decided to feature a "Case of the Week" for the web site, so that the reader can learn more about traffic stops, evidence in DUI/DWI cases and errors made at trial that can help win cases. Some reported cases do not deal directly with DUI/DWI, but relate to some critical issues, such as search and seizure questions. Each week, we will add a new case and ARCHIVE the previous week's case, so that these can be reviewed for up to one full year after being featured. In any event, the reader should understand that a decision in ONE jurisdiction may be either more or less favorably decided in YOUR jurisdiction. Always consult competent DUI/DWI defense counsel before assuming that you have little chance of success at trial. ____________________________________________________________________
Immigrant Seeking To Become Attorney Discovers "Nolo"
Plea to Drug Charge Haunts Her 15 Years Later
In
DUI-DWI cases, a person's failure to understand
potential non-judicial consequences of a guilty or nolo
contendere plea (the law calls these "collateral
consequences") will generally NOT be grounds to set
aside an ill advised plea. However, the Georgia Supreme
Court found that where the immigrant specifically ASKED
her legal counsel about the consequences, and was
misinformed, this amounted to a constitutional violation
for "ineffectice assistance of counsel". Hence, the
ill-advised "no contect" plea to a very questionable
"drug" charge was ordered "vacated" (removed from her
criminal record).
|
||||